: Uses sentiment analysis to detect "revulsion" and "moral protest" in digital discourse [4, 15].
: Used in conflict resolution to identify non-rational moral boundaries that act as informal "deterrence" [4]. Implementation Framework 1. Data Ingestion Gather global discourse on "transgressive" behaviors [1].
: Monitoring when the "stigmatized" entity attempts to flip the label onto the "stigmatizer" [1]. 3. "Subjectivity vs. Science" Heatmap 176. pure taboo
: Identifies when a previously accepted behavior (e.g., specific industrial practices or state behaviors) begins to be treated as a "transgressive" act [1].
Based on the theoretical framework of stigma in international relations [1], the feature would categorize how entities (states, organizations, or individuals) react to being stigmatized: Stigma Recognition : Uses sentiment analysis to detect "revulsion" and
Establish a baseline of what is currently considered "normal." 2. Emotional Analysis
: Visualizes fields of inquiry where subjective data is currently prohibited or ignored, helping researchers find "blind spots" that require a "new gaze" or alternative insight [3]. 4. Taboo Impact Simulator "Subjectivity vs
could be implemented. This feature would analyze the life cycle of a taboo, from its emergence as a "revulsion-based" moral standard to its strategic management by social actors [1]. Feature Concept: The Stigma & Taboo Management Tracker
: To predict the birth of a new social or international "pure taboo." 2. Stigma Management Strategy Analyzer