Aashto Lrfd Bridge Design Specifications 10th Edition [ No Ads ]

Compared to ASD: ASD (FS=1.67) would require ( M_n \geq 1.67 \times (1000+1500) = 4175 ) kip-ft. LRFD requires 3.1% more capacity due to higher live load variability.

[ \sum \eta_i \gamma_i Q_i \leq \phi R_n = R_r ] aashto lrfd bridge design specifications 10th edition

| Limit State | Load Combination | Target Reliability | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | 1.25 DC + 1.75 LL + 1.50 DW | ( \beta \approx 3.5 ) | | Service I | 1.00 DL + 1.00 LL (Deflection check) | No failure (cracking/creep) | | Fatigue | 0.75 LL (Fatigue truck) | ( \beta \approx 2.5 ) (infinite life) | | Extreme Event II | 1.00 DL + 1.00 LL + 1.00 (Collision/Scour) | ( \beta \approx 2.0 ) (survival) | Compared to ASD: ASD (FS=1

Given: DC = 1000 kip-ft, LL = 1500 kip-ft, ( \phi = 0.90 ) (flexure). Demand: ( Q_u = 1.25(1000) + 1.75(1500) = 1250 + 2625 = 3875 ) kip-ft. Required Resistance: ( M_n \geq 3875 / 0.90 = 4305 ) kip-ft. Demand: ( Q_u = 1