Nicholas Hoult’s Steiner is the tragicomic heart. He is not a hero; he is a vessel. Hoult plays him as a decent man slowly corrupted by the intoxicating ease of borrowed power. The film’s most uncomfortable scenes aren’t the racist confrontations, but the quiet moments where Steiner starts to believe his own performance, forgetting that the intelligence he wields belongs to someone else. Where The Banker distinguishes itself from feel-good biopics is its third act. Spoilers for history: the scheme fails not because of a bad investment, but because of a bad law—the 1968 Civil Rights Act’s expansion of fair housing, ironically, exposes their front. They are prosecuted by the federal government, not for fraud against customers (there was none), but for the crime of a Black man owning a bank in a white man’s name.
But to dismiss The Banker as just another "inspiring underdog story" would be to miss its sharper, more uncomfortable thesis: that within a rigged system, intelligence and capital alone are not enough—you also need the right skin color to sign the paperwork. The film is less a triumphant roar than a calculated whisper of rebellion, and its quiet fury is what makes it memorable. The film’s greatest strength is its genre subversion. The Banker is not a civil rights drama in the mold of Selma ; it is a heist film where the vault is the American banking system. Garrett, a brilliant real estate appraiser from Texas, and Morris, a flamboyant existing entrepreneur, don’t march in the streets. They buy the streets. Film The Banker
The courtroom climax is devastatingly low-key. The judge acknowledges that no one lost money, that the bank actually served the underserved. But the letter of the law—designed to protect—is weaponized to punish. Garrett is convicted, Morris dies of a heart attack shortly after, and the system resets. The film does not end with a parade or a presidential pardon (though Garrett was eventually pardoned by Bill Clinton in 1999). It ends with a title card, a quiet admission that justice, when it comes, is often posthumous and administrative. It is impossible to discuss The Banker without acknowledging the controversy that shadowed its release. In 2020, the real-life daughters of Bernard Garrett and the son of Joe Morris filed a lawsuit against the producers, claiming the film defamed their fathers by fabricating events—specifically, allegations of coercion and sexual misconduct against Morris and suggesting Garrett’s wife (played by Nia Long) was a mere secretary. (The suit was later amended and settled out of court.) Nicholas Hoult’s Steiner is the tragicomic heart
The screenplay meticulously lays out the "con": using Steiner as the visible CEO, they acquire the Pennsylvanian Bank in a depressed, predominantly Black neighborhood of Los Angeles. The irony is thick. They teach Steiner about balance sheets, golf etiquette, and classical music—not just to pass as wealthy, but to perform whiteness as a financial asset. One of the film’s best sequences involves a silent, tense exam where Steiner, coached through an earpiece by Garrett, parrots financial answers to a skeptical board. The scene crackles not with physical danger, but with the terror of intellectual exposure—a fate that for Garrett and Morris carries the penalty of legal and social erasure. The film’s most uncomfortable scenes aren’t the racist
At first glance, Apple TV+’s The Banker looks like a slick, conventional period piece: tailored suits, polished shoes, and the gleaming facade of 1960s American capitalism. Directed by George Nolfi, the film tells the remarkable true story of Bernard Garrett (Anthony Mackie) and Joe Morris (Samuel L. Jackson), two Black entrepreneurs who, in the teeth of Jim Crow, devise an ingenious scheme to buy banks. Their method? Recruit a working-class white man, Matt Steiner (Nicholas Hoult), to act as the front while they pull the strings from the shadows.
Samuel L. Jackson, as Joe Morris, provides the necessary counterweight. Morris is the hustler’s id, the man who wants the nightclubs, the fast cars, and the public glory. Jackson plays him with a weary swagger, his famous cadence slowed down into a jazz-like rhythm of regret and pragmatism. The film’s emotional core is the friction between Garrett’s discipline and Morris’s desire for recognition—a philosophical argument about whether to beat the system or burn it down.
