Welcome to our English website. Not everything is translated yet so if you have any questions please contact us.

  • Customer service: +31 (0)24 641 94 74
    Mail:

Soderbergh does something clever: until the very end. We only see the reactions of those watching. This forces the viewer to search for meaning in the faces of the listeners, not the recorded images. The videotape becomes a Rorschach test.

Introduction: A Title That Lies (And Tells the Truth) When Steven Soderbergh’s sex, lies, and videotape premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in 1989, its lowercase, grammatically stuttering title announced something radically different. This wasn’t a steamy thriller. It was a quiet, intimate drama about what happens when people try to search for honesty using the one medium that can also fabricate it: video.

The answer sex, lies, and videotape offers is both hopeful and cynical: . And sometimes, a videotape is the only place we allow ourselves to be honest. Further viewing : Compare with The Conversation (1974), Sliding Doors (1998, also starring Gwyneth Paltrow as a variation on Ann), and the documentary Searching for Sugar Man (2012) – which asks whether a recording can be more real than the artist who made it.

Would you like a more specific angle—such as the film’s cinematography, its sexual politics, or a scene-by-scene breakdown?