Try akhr = ekhr → e?h? maybe e a r ? hmm.

ggybj dbzp nspi zpsi zhwzi — looks random.

ggold jlnx zuxe nxue nfqne — no. Given the structure, I’d guess this is a simple substitution. A plausible solution if ttbyq = quick ? q(16) in cipher = q? But t=19 for q? t=19, q=16, diff -3; next t=19, u=20, diff +1 — no.

Check earlier wyak with a=e, k=a, so wy e a = wy e a . If w→w, y→h, then w h e a = ‘whea’? ‘whe a’? ‘when’? Needs n. Possibly y→h, then wyak = w h e a → ‘whea’? Actually if y→h, w→w, a=e, k=a → ‘w h e a’ — could be ‘whe a’ for ‘wheat’? Missing t.

Word wyek — maybe ‘with’? w→w? if y→i, e→t, k→h: but e is already ‘t’? But e in cipher = t? Then k→h? Possibly.

Let’s reverse each word: ttbyq → qybtt wyak → kayw mhkr → r k h m → rkhm akhr → rhka asdar → radsa