At its core, the film follows a classic comedic premise: the impersonation. Two Bucharest intellectuals, Radu and his friend, arrive in a serene Danube Delta village. To impress the local beauty, the schoolteacher Corina, Radu pretends to be a famous, world-weary actor named Florin. This lie, born of male insecurity and romantic ambition, becomes the engine of the plot. Saizescu uses this deception not merely for slapstick, but as a scalpel to dissect the masks men wear in courtship. Radu is not a villain; he is a recognizable figure of vanity. The film’s genius lies in making us root for him even as we wince at his fabrications. We recognize that his invented persona—the melancholic artist—is simply a more romanticized version of the man he wishes he could be.
Visually, Saizescu and cinematographer Aurel Kostrakiewicz bathe the film in a luminous, almost Mediterranean light. The title promises a smile, and the screen delivers a near-constant radiance. The Danube Delta is not just a backdrop but an active participant: a lush, lazy labyrinth of reed beds and still waters that seems to exist outside of time. This setting creates a hothouse atmosphere where emotions intensify and social rules loosen. The city dwellers, stiff in their formal wear, are gradually undone by the humidity, the slow pace, and the earthy directness of the villagers. Saizescu contrasts the artificiality of Bucharest’s intellectual salons with the visceral reality of the Delta—where fish are caught, wine is poured, and a smile is worth more than a theater review. UN SURIS IN PLINA VARA -1964- - de Geo Saizescu...
Nevertheless, Un surâs în plină vară endures because it captures a universal feeling: the memory of a season when we pretended to be someone slightly better than ourselves, and for a brief moment, we almost believed it. Geo Saizescu directs with a light touch, never letting the philosophical weight sink the buoyant charm. The film is a smile itself—ephemeral, warm, and unexpectedly profound. It reminds us that in the fullness of summer, even a lie can feel like the truth, and a single smile can be a story worth telling. For lovers of classic cinema, and for anyone who has ever fallen in love on vacation, this Romanian gem remains a pure, radiant delight. At its core, the film follows a classic
If the film has a weakness, it is its occasional reliance on broad physical humor that dates it to its era. Some of the secondary characters—the jealous suitor, the nosy old woman—veer toward caricature. Moreover, the resolution, which ties up the romantic complications with a neat bow, feels slightly rushed, sacrificing some of the bittersweet ambiguity the summer setting promised. One wonders what Saizescu might have achieved with a slightly sharper edge, a hint of the melancholy that shadows all sun-drenched idylls. This lie, born of male insecurity and romantic
In the landscape of Eastern European cinema, the 1960s were a decade of thaw—both politically and artistically. While figures like Mikhalkov or Forman were gaining international acclaim, Romanian directors were quietly crafting a cinema of witty social observation. Among them, Geo Saizescu carved a unique niche as a master of light comedy. His 1964 film, Un surâs în plină vară (A Smile in the Fullness of Summer), stands as a sparkling testament to his craft. More than just a romantic romp, the film is a sophisticated, sun-drenched exploration of performative identity, the intoxicating yet deceptive nature of summer love, and the subtle clash between urban cynicism and rural authenticity.